Differences:
The differences (conceptual) between WCF and ASMX Services can he highlighted by several items, but we will discuss the 2 largest.
The differences (conceptual) between WCF and ASMX Services can he highlighted by several items, but we will discuss the 2 largest.
Protocols Support for WCF Service
WCF
WCF
- HTTP
- TCP
- Named Pipes
- MSMQ
- Custom
- UDP
Protocols Support for ASMX Web Service)
ASMX:
HTTP only
ASMX:
HTTP only
Hosting:
ASMX: Can be hosted only with HttpRuntime in IIS
WCF: A WCF component can be hosted in any environment in .NET 3.0 such as a console application, Windows applications, of even IIS
WCF Servces can be hosted outside of a IIS web server
ASMX: Can be hosted only with HttpRuntime in IIS
WCF: A WCF component can be hosted in any environment in .NET 3.0 such as a console application, Windows applications, of even IIS
WCF Servces can be hosted outside of a IIS web server
Ok we’re looked at the overall differences between ASMX Web Services and WCF Services, so now let look at some major advantages of a WCF service and an ASMX Web Service:
- Multiple Protocols:
WCF can work across multiple protocols like HTTP,TCP, MSMQ, etc while ASMX services can use just one, HTTP - Better Interoperability:
WCF is interoperable with other systems, compared to .Net Remoting where the client and service have to be .Net. - Logging:
WCF has a built-in logging system. Simply changing the config file settings provides loging functionality. In ASMX the programmer as to write their own. - Transactions:
- Exeptions:
In ASMX unhandled exceptions are returned to the client (browser, user, etc) as SOAP faults, which WCF does not return then as SOAP faults
WCF can create, and maintain, transactions like COM+
Limitations of ASMX:
- An ASMX page doesnt vital information such as what type of security to use or how to deliver.
- ASMX is tightly coupled with the HTTP runtime, in face it’s so tight with it it’s dependant on IIS to host it.
- ASMX services are instantiated on a per-call basis only.
- ASMX does provide the way for interoperability but with that theres no guaranteed end-to-end security or even reliable communication (which is its job).
Advantages of WCF:
- Unlike ASMX WCF lets you chose the delivery tyoe and type of security, just a minor tweak to the config file is all thats needed.
- A WCF Service can be hosted by any Windows process, as long as it can host .NET Framework 3.0.
- WCF gives you the flexibility on how the service is instantiated such as Singleton, provate session, or per call (which is the only one ASMX offers).
- Not only is WCF interoperable but it also offers end-to-end reliability and security
One more think t
No comments:
Post a Comment